May 12, 2011
It is important that EMIR address intragroup transactions in a way that is (a) proportionate and appropriate for the real level of risk involved (taking into account that the client–facing transactions will be either cleared or bilaterally margined (depending on whether the contract is clearing-eligible) and these are internal group back-to-back transactions, which do not increase inter-connectedness in the financial system) and (b) internationally coherent, in such a way that European and US (and other) financial groups can continue to compete for clients on a safe basis, and ensuring that risk management is not compartmentalised geographically (EMIR should not promote trade barriers).
Share This Article:
Share ISDA-AFMR brief on intragroup transactions (EMIR) of 12 May 2011on Facebook. May trigger a new window or tab to open. Share ISDA-AFMR brief on intragroup transactions (EMIR) of 12 May 2011on Twitter. May trigger a new window or tab to open. Share ISDA-AFMR brief on intragroup transactions (EMIR) of 12 May 2011on LinkedIn. May trigger a new window or tab to open. Share ISDA-AFMR brief on intragroup transactions (EMIR) of 12 May 2011via email. May trigger a new window or your email client to open.Documents (1) for ISDA-AFMR brief on intragroup transactions (EMIR) of 12 May 2011
Related Articles
Europe
Sep 30, 2024
Public Policy
ISDA Response on DTO and PTRRS
Europe
Sep 23, 2024
Public Policy
Statement on EMIR 3.0 Implementation Dates
Tags: