It is important that EMIR address intragroup transactions in a way that is (a) proportionate and appropriate for the real level of risk involved (taking into account that the client–facing transactions will be either cleared or bilaterally margined (depending on whether the contract is clearing-eligible) and these are internal group back-to-back transactions, which do not increase inter-connectedness in the financial system) and (b) internationally coherent, in such a way that European and US (and other) financial groups can continue to compete for clients on a safe basis, and ensuring that risk management is not compartmentalised geographically (EMIR should not promote trade barriers).
Documents (1) for ISDA-AFMR brief on intragroup transactions (EMIR) of 12 May 2011
Latest
Response to FCA on Post-trade Transparency
On October 16, ISDA responded to the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) consultation CP26/30. While the consultation is principally focused on cash equity market structure and transparency, ISDA responded to questions on the potential inclusion of equity swaps in the scope...
Efficiency is Vital to Delivering Resilience
With less than three months to go until implementation of US Treasury clearing begins at the end of this year, it’s critical that the mandate is safely implemented without compromising market efficiency. This represents a huge change in market structure,...
ISDA In Review – September 2026
A compendium of links to new documents, research papers, press releases and comment letters published by ISDA in September 2026.
ISDA Digital Assets Forum Opening Remarks
ISDA Digital Assets Forum Washington, DC October 6, 2026 Opening Remarks Scott O’Malia, CEO, ISDA Good morning, and a very warm welcome to the ISDA Digital Assets Forum. Thanks for joining us today, and a special thank you to...