ISDA and AFME wrote to the European Commission (“EC”) regarding the EC compromise draft on capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties (“CCPs”) in the Capital Requirements Regulation (“Draft CRR Text”) observing a number of differences between the Draft CRR Text and the Basel international standards set out in the interim framework for determining capital requirements for bank exposures to CCPs, viz. BCBS 227 of July 2012.
Documents (1) for ISDA and AFME response to the EC re. compromise draft on capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties
Latest
Equity Definitions VE InfoHub
This page will be updated on a regular basis as relevant information becomes available and will serve as a repository for information from ISDA relating to the initiative to update the 2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions (the “2002 Equity Definitions”)....
ISDA responds to FSB on leverage in NBFI
On February 28, ISDA responded to the Financial Stability Board’s (FSB) consultation on leverage in the non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI) sector. In the response, ISDA makes the following points: Due to the diverse nature of the NBFI sector (in terms...
ISDA responds to BoE rules for FMIs
On February 19, ISDA submitted a response to a consultation from the Bank of England (BoE) on a proposal to introduce a set of rules for UK financial market infrastructures (FMIs), including central counterparties (CCPs). In the response, ISDA expresses...
Updated OTC Derivatives Compliance Calendar
ISDA has updated its global calendar of compliance deadlines and regulatory dates for the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives space.