Common Principles – Examples (Substituted Compliance)

In our “Methodology for Regulatory Comparisons” document, ISDA proposed concepts to guide the comparisons of derivatives regulations that will be carried out by regulators assessing the possibility of substituted compliance. Our methodology relies on regulators, with input from the markets, developing common principles that will apply in various subject matter areas within derivatives regulation. These principles should be cast to support comparability of regulation without requiring identical regulation. To illustrate our proposed methodology, we offer the following examples of common principles. These examples have been developed and organized in relation to several of the original G-20 derivatives goals. (To be clear, these are merely examples and do not purport to illustrate comprehensive treatment of their subject matter areas.)

Tags:

,

Documents (1) for Common Principles – Examples (Substituted Compliance)

ISDA AGM Studio: David Bailey

David Bailey, executive director, prudential policy, at the Bank of England, speaks with ISDA CEO Scott O’Malia about the UK’s approach to Basel 3.1, the impact of the revised US Basel III endgame on cross‑border consistency and the role of the...

ISDA AGM Studio: Scott O'Malia and Chris Edmonds

Christopher Edmonds, president, fixed income & data services, at Intercontinental Exchange, speaks with Scott O’Malia, ISDA CEO, about how market volatility, regulatory change and technological transformation are reshaping global markets. The discussion explores what recent volatility has meant for participation,...

ISDA AGM Studio: Bill Borden, Microsoft

Bill Borden, corporate vice president, worldwide financial services, at Microsoft, speaks with Mark New, ISDA’s co-head of digital transformation and senior counsel, about how artificial intelligence (AI) is shaping the future of financial markets and the key factors firms should...