August 22, 2014
The margin rules proposed by the European Supervisory Authorities (the “ESAs”) require IM to be
segregated from proprietary assets on the books and records of a third party holder or custodian,
or via other legally effective arrangements. In addition, the rules require cash IM to be segregated individually, unless other legally effective arrangements are in place to segregate it from proprietary assets. Several additional clarifications and issues are described in the letter sent by ISDA to the ESAs in July 20143. As proposed, we illustrate below the unintended consequences arising from the IM segregation
requirements.
Share This Article:
Share ISDA letter to the ESAs on Estimates of numbers of accounts affected by IM segregation requirements, to demonstrate operational challengeson Facebook. May trigger a new window or tab to open. Share ISDA letter to the ESAs on Estimates of numbers of accounts affected by IM segregation requirements, to demonstrate operational challengeson Twitter. May trigger a new window or tab to open. Share ISDA letter to the ESAs on Estimates of numbers of accounts affected by IM segregation requirements, to demonstrate operational challengeson LinkedIn. May trigger a new window or tab to open. Share ISDA letter to the ESAs on Estimates of numbers of accounts affected by IM segregation requirements, to demonstrate operational challengesvia email. May trigger a new window or your email client to open.Documents (1) for ISDA letter to the ESAs on Estimates of numbers of accounts affected by IM segregation requirements, to demonstrate operational challenges
Related Articles
Capital
Dec 13, 2024
Risk & Capital
FRTB Capitalization of Funds
Capital
Jul 18, 2024
Risk & Capital
ISDA and SIFMA Submit Addendum on GIRR Curvature to US Basel III NPR
Capital
Jun 10, 2024
Risk & Capital