In late 2014, ISDA carried a survey of firms who report trades under EMIR – firms were asked to respond to questions about how different trade types are reported and why. The purpose was to understand the approach firms take to trades representation when reporting and to see if there were specific problems for particular products or events which might be standardized by a best practice for trade representation.
Documents (2) for Industry Survey Results – Packaged Transactions
Latest
Maintaining Focus on Basel III Endgame Recalibration
In its original form, the US Basel III endgame proposal would have resulted in disproportionate increases in capital for trading book activities, forcing banks to make difficult choices about their participation in certain businesses. After two-and-a-half years, a revised proposal...
IRRBB Management in EMDEs
Interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB) has become a growing priority for banks and regulators in emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs). As many of these countries face monetary tightening cycles and ongoing macroeconomic volatility, bank balance sheets...
Response to CPMI-IOSCO on Consultation
On February 5, ISDA and FIA responded to the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) consultation on the management of general business risks and general business losses by financial market infrastructures (FMIs)....
Trading Book Capital: Scott O'Malia Remarks
Trading Book Capital: Capital Conundrum, Navigating Basel III Endgame February 5, 2026 Welcoming Remarks Scott O’Malia, ISDA Chief Executive Good afternoon, and welcome to ISDA’s Trading Book Capital event – it’s great to be here in New York. We...