In late 2014, ISDA carried a survey of firms who report trades under EMIR – firms were asked to respond to questions about how different trade types are reported and why. The purpose was to understand the approach firms take to trades representation when reporting and to see if there were specific problems for particular products or events which might be standardized by a best practice for trade representation.
Documents (2) for Industry Survey Results – Packaged Transactions
Latest
ISDA Briefing on EMIR Compromise Amendments under MISP
On November 2, ISDA published its recommendations on the European Parliament (EP) compromise amendments to EMIR under the Market Integration and Supervision Package (MISP). The briefing covers five areas: transaction reporting (Article 9), non-financial counterparties (Article 10), initial margin model...
Response on UK MIFIR Reporting Guidelines
On November 6, ISDA responded to the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) consultation CP26/34 ‘Preparing for the new transaction reporting regime’ on the upcoming changes to the UK Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MIFIR) transaction reporting regime, as set out in...
Response on Transaction Reporting and Transparency
On October 30, ISDA submitted comments on the European Parliament’s (EP) proposed transaction reporting and transparency-related amendments to the European Commission’s Market Integration and Supervision Package (MISP). On transaction reporting, ISDA commends the EP’s ambition but cautions against trying to...
Joint Paper on EC Tax Omnibus
On November 5, ISDA, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) and the International Securities Lending Association (ISLA) submitted a paper to support the proposed European Commission (EC) Tax Omnibus as a route to simpler, more certain cross-border taxation....