On September 11, ISDA responded jointly with the other associations (IIF/IBFed/GFMA) to the BCBS consultation on interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB). The response supports the goal of ensuring that banks continue to manage IRRBB effectively, and that appropriate transparency is achieved to properly gauge banks’ IRRBB exposure. However, it reiterates these goals can be pursued within a Pillar 2 and Pillar 3 frameworks. Given the nature of IRRBB, the industry does not believe that a Pillar 1 approach is appropriate.
Documents (1) for Joint associations’ response to BCBS consultation on IRRBB
Latest
Response to EC Consultation on MICA Review
On September 29, ISDA responded to the European Commission’s (EC) targeted consultation on the review of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MICA). ISDA’s response focuses on tokenization in over-the-counter derivatives and collateral markets. It argues that tokenized collateral can enable...
ISDA DTF Hong Kong: Steven Kennedy Remarks
ISDA Derivatives Trading Forum Hong Kong November 12, 2026 Opening Remarks Steven Kennedy Global Head of Public Policy, ISDA Good morning, and welcome to the ISDA Derivatives Trading Forum. It’s great to be here in Hong Kong – thanks for...
2026 FX Definitions: Act Now
On November 22, 2027, the 2026 FX Definitions will come into effect. From that point, these definitions will become the market standard for all cleared and new non-cleared FX derivatives, and the Swift messaging service will halt its support of...
IRD Trading in Mainland China and Hong Kong
This report examines interest rate derivatives (IRD) trading activity in mainland China and Hong Kong in the first half of 2026. Onshore renminbi (RMB) IRD traded notional in mainland China rose to $3.4 trillion in the first half of 2026,...