In order to reduce the risk of market fragmentation and to enhance trading liquidity between US and European markets, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and European Union (EU) regulators should establish clear and comprehensive regimes to facilitate mutual recognition of execution platforms and trading requirements. This paper is designed to assist the CFTC with implementing a framework for finding comparability through an analysis of the US swap execution facility (SEF) core principles in the context of the European regulatory framework, and to support the CFTC in developing a ‘registration-lite’ approach for EU trading venues.
In developing an approach to comparability, the CFTC should apply the principles outlined in the final report issued by the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) Task Force on Cross-Border Regulation, and recognize the broad commonalities between the US and EU regimes, rather than focus on technical differences between the underlying rules.
We encourage the CFTC to compare the core principles for SEFs established by the US Congress with corresponding European regulations, with a view to determining whether the rules for EU trading venues achieve the same objectives and offer the same protections as the requirements set out in the SEF core principles. Where these requirements are satisfied, the CFTC should allow EU trading venues to be exempt from SEF registration and compliance with the SEF rules. In addition, parties to a swap subject to the US trading mandate should be able to satisfy their obligations by executing on an EU trading venue in accordance with applicable rules, regardless of their status as a US person or otherwise.
Click on the PDF below to read the full paper.
Documents (1) for Principles for US/EU Trading Platform Recognition
Latest
Marking a Milestone - IQ January 2025
It was a different time and a very different market, but 1985 remains a seminal year in the history of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives – the year that ISDA was established and the very first industry standard document was published. While...
Response to FCA on SI Regime
On January 10, ISDA and the Global Foreign Exchange Division (GFXD) of the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA) responded to questions from the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) on the future of the systematic internalizer (SI) regime. In the response,...
Response to CSA on Clearing Obligation
On December 19, ISDA submitted a response to the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) consultation on proposed amendments to the clearing obligation in Canada. The CSA invited comments on the proposed amendments and on the specific question set out in Annex B...
Derivatives Regulations and Usage in Japan
Japan’s regulatory landscape has generally been supportive of derivatives use by various segments of the buy side. While there are some guidelines on the purposes for which derivatives can be used by certain entities, which are not unique to Japan,...