Executive Summary
- The leverage ratio is a poor indicator of bank condition.
- The Proposal would not meaningfully reduce the aggregate level of Tier 1 capital required to be held by U.S. GSIBs, nor would it undermine in any way the overall resilience of the banking sector or the financial system as a whole.
- The proposed modifications to the eSLR requirements would better align those requirements with their appropriate role as a backstop to risk-based capital requirements and reduce disparities between the U.S. capital framework and international standards. Additional modifications would further improve the role of the eSLR within the U.S. capital framework.
- The Proposal’s use of the Federal Reserve’s GSIB surcharge rule to determine eSLR requirements increases the importance of a comprehensive reassessment and recalibration of the U.S. GSIB surcharge.
- The eSLR requirement for subsidiary IDIs of U.S. GSIBs should be implemented as a buffer requirement instead of a requirement for well-capitalized status under the prompt corrective action (“PCA”) framework.
- The Agencies should make changes to the denominators for leverage capital requirements to further improve the regulatory capital framework.
- The Federal Reserve should make further changes to the TLAC SLR and LTD SLR requirements applicable to U.S. GSIBs in addition to modifying these requirements to reflect the recalibration of the eSLR.
- recalibrate the minimum LTD SLR requirement for U.S. GSIBs from 4.5% of total leverage exposure to 2.5% of total leverage exposure, without incorporating half of a firm’s GSIB surcharge in the minimum requirement or requiring it as a buffer; and
- recalibrate the minimum LTD SLR and LTD Tier 1 leverage ratio requirements for non-resolution covered IHCs to 1.875% and 2.625%, respectively, to reflect the appropriate scaling of internal TLAC requirements for non-resolution covered IHCs.
- Recalibrating the TLAC SLR buffer from a uniform 2% amount to half of a firm’s GSIB surcharge would appropriately reflect the proposed modifications to the eSLR buffer.
- The Federal Reserve should recalibrate the minimum TLAC SLR requirement from 7.5% to 5.5% to reflect the capital refill framework, or, at a minimum, recalibrate the minimum requirement from 7.5% to 6.75% to eliminate U.S. gold-plating relative to international standards.
- Any changes to the calibration of the minimum TLAC SLR requirement for U.S. GSIBs should result in corresponding changes to the minimum TLAC SLR requirement for covered IHCs to reflect the appropriate scaling of internal TLAC requirements for covered IHCs.
- The Federal Reserve should eliminate the separate LTD requirements applicable to U.S. GSIBs and covered IHCs from the TLAC rule, or at least eliminate the LTD SLR requirement. If the Federal Reserve retains the LTD SLR requirement, it should:
- recalibrate the minimum LTD SLR requirement for U.S. GSIBs from 4.5% of total leverage exposure to 2.5% of total leverage exposure, without incorporating half of a firm’s GSIB surcharge in the minimum requirement or requiring it as a buffer; and
- recalibrate the minimum LTD SLR and LTD Tier 1 leverage ratio requirements for non-resolution covered IHCs to 1.875% and 2.625%, respectively, to reflect the appropriate scaling of internal TLAC requirements for non-resolution covered IHCs.
- The Proposal’s clarification of the formulas used to calculate a firm’s TLAC buffer amount(s) would improve the TLAC rule.
Documents (1) for Joint Trades eSLR/TLAC Comment Letter
Latest
Response on Commodity Derivatives Markets
On April 22, ISDA and FIA submitted a joint response to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on the functioning of commodity derivatives markets and certain aspects relating to spot energy markets. In addition to questions on position management, reporting and...
Episode 50: The Value of Derivatives
A new report from ISDA shows that companies all over the world use derivatives to alleviate uncertainty, transfer risk and enhance profitability. ISDA discusses the findings with Boston Consulting Group’s Roy Choudhury. Please view this page via Chrome to access...
ISDA/IIF Response to EC Market Risk Consultation
On February 22, ISDA and the Institute of International Finance (IIF) submitted a joint response to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on the application of the market risk prudential framework. The associations believe the capital framework should be risk-appropriate and...
ISDA Submits Letter on Environmental Credits
On April 15, ISDA submitted a response to the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) consultation on environmental credits and environmental credit obligations. The response supports the FASB’s overall proposals to establish clear and consistent accounting guidance for environmental credits, but...