Actual Cleared Volumes vs. Mandated Cleared Volumes: Analyzing the US Derivatives Market

Encouraging the clearing of standardized derivatives has been a major priority for policy-makers. This has primarily been pursued through the implementation of clearing mandates, but other incentives also exist – netting and capital benefits, and the rollout of margining requirements for non-cleared derivatives, for example. As a result, the majority of interest rate derivatives (IRD) traded notional is now cleared.

This paper analyzes the volume of cleared derivatives to determine the impact of these incentives. In particular, the paper compares cleared notional amounts of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives with the amounts subject to the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) clearing mandate. The results show that market participants clear more transactions than required under the CFTC’s clearing mandate.

Documents (1) for Actual Cleared Volumes vs. Mandated Cleared Volumes: Analyzing the US Derivatives Market

A Welcome Extension on US Treasury Clearing

Yesterday, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced it would delay the implementation of mandatory clearing for US Treasury securities by one year. That means eligible cash transactions will now need to be cleared by December 31, 2026, with...

ISDA and FIA Response on Pre-Hedging

On February 21, ISDA and FIA responded to the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO)’s consultation report on pre-hedging. In the response, the associations highlight that an appropriate, consistent and well-understood framework for pre-hedging is important for safe and efficient...