ISDA has teamed up with Greenwich Associates to conduct a survey that explores the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on derivatives market liquidity. The survey investigates the causes of the liquidity disruption that occurred in March 2020, the scope and extent of the problem, and the impact of government intervention.
Highlights from the survey include:
- The top financial event related to COVID-19 that disrupted liquidity was perceived to be the reduced risk appetite of banks. Close behind was the sudden need for short-term funding by corporates.
- The primary response to managing liquidity issues was to trade in smaller sizes. This was, by far, the most commonly cited buy-side response.
- Liquidity deteriorated in multiple product sets and in nearly all regions. Market participants in the UK were particularly negative on liquidity, with 96% of respondents reporting declines or large declines in liquidity before central bank intervention.
- Liquidity providers listed a number of issues that hindered their ability to provide liquidity, including one-way flows, increased volatility and the breakdown of basis trades. These varied depending on region, with the cost of short-term funding cited as a bigger issue in Asia and the EU than in the UK and US.
- Government intervention was seen as an important factor in restoring market liquidity, with 67% of market participants characterizing US Federal Reserve and US Treasury action as effective or extremely effective. A similar proportion (59%) categorized action by the European Central Bank and European Commission as effective or extremely effective.
- When asked about the impact of financial regulatory reform of the past decade, the top response was that it ensured banks were sufficiently capitalized to weather the current crisis. The second most cited response was that it reduced the capacity of banks to provide liquidity and to extend their balance sheets to businesses.
The survey was based on responses by 172 buy- and sell-side market participants from across the globe.
Read the full survey by clicking on the attached PDF.
Documents (1) for New Survey on Derivatives Market Liquidity and COVID-19
Latest
Deadline Pressure on Treasury Clearing
By the end of this year, the first phase of the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Treasury clearing mandate is scheduled to come into force, affecting users of US Treasury securities all over the world. It’s difficult to overstate...
ISDA Publishes Equity Definitions VE, Version 2.0
ISDA has published version 2.0 of the ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions (Versionable Edition) (the “Equity Definitions VE”) on the MyLibrary platform. This publication includes, among other updates, provisions that can be used for documenting transactions with time-weighted average price or volume-weighted average price features,...
Marking a Milestone - IQ January 2025
It was a different time and a very different market, but 1985 remains a seminal year in the history of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives – the year that ISDA was established and the very first industry standard document was published. While...
Response to FCA on SI Regime
On January 10, ISDA and the Global Foreign Exchange Division (GFXD) of the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA) responded to questions from the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) on the future of the systematic internalizer (SI) regime. In the response,...