The transition to a low carbon economy is estimated to require significant funding globally. The voluntary carbon market continues to play a critical role in that transition by helping to channel funding into projects that reduce carbon emissions or remove carbon from the atmosphere.
A robust voluntary carbon market must be grounded in a strong legal foundation. Much of the process of creating, verifying and transferring the benefit of project activities that reduce emissions already exists within robust legal frameworks. As the market grows in size and complexity, however, secondary markets in fungible voluntary carbon credits (VCCs) would be significantly enhanced by steps being taken both nationally and internationally to better understand the legal nature of VCCs.
As with any intangible asset, the legal nature determines how VCCs as a fungible instrument can be created, bought, sold and retired. It affects what type of security may be taken and enforced in relation to VCCs and how that can be achieved, as well as how VCCs would be treated following an insolvency (including with regard to netting). It may also have an impact on broader considerations, including the regulatory, tax and accounting treatment of VCCs. In short, understanding the legal treatment of VCCs is necessary to achieve deep and liquid secondary markets, which, in turn, will enable the development of a clear price signal for carbon and allow funds to be efficiently channeled to emissions-reducing projects.
Furthering that legal understanding in different jurisdictions will help optimize the enormous potential that a global voluntary carbon market can offer. This whitepaper investigates the legal treatment of VCCs and considers certain other aspects of VCC transactions (such as when they might be regulated as derivatives). The paper also sets out recommended steps that can be taken to further develop legal certainty in VCCs at both a global and jurisdictional level.
Click on the attached PDF to read the paper in full.
A supplemental paper covering France, Japan, Singapore is available HERE.
Documents (1) for Legal Implications of Voluntary Carbon Credits
Latest
Recognition of Cross-product Netting is Critical
US regulators are in the process of making important changes to the regulatory capital framework by proposing modifications to the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio, which should help stop it from acting as a non-risk-sensitive constraint on bank capacity – a...
ISDA, GFXD Response to FCA on SI Regime
On September 10, ISDA and the Global Foreign Exchange Division (GFXD) of the Global Financial Markets Association responded to the Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) consultation paper CP25/20 on the systematic internalizer (SI) regime for derivatives and bonds. ISDA and the...
ISDA, IIF Response to PRA on Market Risk Framework
On September 12, ISDA and the Institute of International Finance (IIF) submitted a joint response to the Prudential Regulation Authority’s (PRA) consultation on adjustments to the market risk capital framework (CP 17/25). ISDA and the IIF strongly believe the market...
ISDA Response on Clearing Costs
On September 8, ISDA responded to consultation by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on a draft regulatory technical standard on clearing fees and associated costs (article 7c(4) of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR)). In the response, ISDA...