On March 31, ISDA and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) submitted a joint response to the HM Treasury (HMT) consultation on implementation of the Basel 3.1 standards.
The implementation of the Basel 3.1 standards in the UK is a necessary element of preserving financial stability and provides an opportunity to review the framework more holistically, ensuring it is appropriately calibrated and takes account of the specificities of the UK market. It is crucial that the Basel 3.1 framework is implemented in a risk-sensitive way that results in a robust UK banking sector that is effective in financing the wider economy.
Key points in the response include:
- Comments on HMT’s proposed exercise of the Section 3 revocation power: these cover specific articles, as well as broader recommendations for bringing clarity to the framework;
- Proposed changes to better operationalize the exemption for intragroup transactions from credit valuation adjustment capital requirements;
- Recommendations to rationalize equivalence arrangements in the UK Capital Requirements Regulation;
- A request that: 1) HMT creates a new equivalence regime for third countries, or alternatively amends the definition of covered bonds, in line with Basel, to allow non-UK issued bonds to be considered for preferential treatment; and 2) Export Credit Agencies (ECAs) classed as quasi-sovereign public sector entity ECAs are treated the same as those ECAs classed as sovereigns as permitted by the Basel standard;
- Recommendations for longer-term solutions to increase credit rating coverage; and
- A request that a dedicated list relating to equivalence is published by HMT in the case of recognized exchanges that can be assessed and expanded.
Documents (1) for ISDA Responds to HMT Consultation on Basel 3.1 Implementation
Latest
Joint Response to 2026 US G-SIB Surcharge Proposal
On June 18, ISDA, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and the Institute of International Finance submitted a joint response to US agencies on proposed changes to the surcharge for global systemically important banks (G-SIBs). The associations welcome the...
Eyeing the Basel III Finish Line
An effective regulatory capital framework relies on multiple ingredients, from appropriate drafting to rigorous testing and consultation. Even minor calibration distortions can inflate capital requirements, which could negatively affect the capacity of banks to support deep and liquid markets, with...
Joint Comment Letter on Basel III Endgame Proposal
The Institute of International Finance (IIF), the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) today submitted a joint comment letter to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the...
Joint Response to 2026 US Basel III Proposal
On June 18, ISDA, the Institute of International Finance and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association submitted a joint response to the 2026 US Basel III notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR). The response focuses on the Fundamental Review of...
