On May 16, ISDA, FIA and FIA European Principal Traders Association submitted a joint response to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on the review of the Regulation on Wholesale Energy Market Integrity and Transparency (REMIT). In the response, the associations highlight their concerns over several draft amendments in the legislative proposal. These include the expansion of the definitions of ‘Person Professionally Arranging Transactions’ to include a reference to ‘Persons professionally engaged […] in the execution of transactions in wholesale energy products’. The associations note that the additional reference to ‘execution’ could ultimately capture anyone who, as part of their profession, is a counterparty to a transaction relating to a wholesale energy product including, for example, any end user buying a wholesale energy product for its energy-intensive industrial process. Furthermore, the associations believe that the proposed changes to Article 9 with respect to third-country firms will create an unjustified and disproportionate market barrier and could have a negative impact on the EU power and gas market and its liquidity, as it is unclear whether the proposed change requires establishing an EU branch or if it would suffice to provide an address. Introducing a requirement to establish EU entities would lead to a competitive disadvantage for the European power and gas market, as well as a significant reduction in liquidity.
Documents (1) for Joint Trade Associations Response to EC on REMIT
Latest
Recognition of Cross-product Netting is Critical
US regulators are in the process of making important changes to the regulatory capital framework by proposing modifications to the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio, which should help stop it from acting as a non-risk-sensitive constraint on bank capacity – a...
ISDA, GFXD Response to FCA on SI Regime
On September 10, ISDA and the Global Foreign Exchange Division (GFXD) of the Global Financial Markets Association responded to the Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) consultation paper CP25/20 on the systematic internalizer (SI) regime for derivatives and bonds. ISDA and the...
ISDA, IIF Response to PRA on Market Risk Framework
On September 12, ISDA and the Institute of International Finance (IIF) submitted a joint response to the Prudential Regulation Authority’s (PRA) consultation on adjustments to the market risk capital framework (CP 17/25). ISDA and the IIF strongly believe the market...
ISDA Response on Clearing Costs
On September 8, ISDA responded to consultation by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on a draft regulatory technical standard on clearing fees and associated costs (article 7c(4) of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR)). In the response, ISDA...