On March 28, ISDA and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) submitted a joint response to the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) consultation on its approach to policy. The associations highlight the importance of considering UK market specificities in meeting the secondary competitiveness and growth objective, and in the implementation of international standards. The associations express their support for the continuation of structured policy development in dialogue with the industry, while also advocating for the enhancement of the PRA’s stakeholder engagement by re-establishing standing groups and horizon risk scanning groups, and greater industry cooperation during the initiation phase of the policy cycle. Other key points in the response include recommendations on clustering regulatory principles and suggested improvements to the cost-benefit analysis and data collection processes to achieve greater transparency.
Documents (1) for ISDA Responds to PRA on Approach to Policy
Latest
Updated OTC Derivatives Compliance Calendar
ISDA has updated its global calendar of compliance deadlines and regulatory dates for the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives space.
ISDA Publishes Saudi Arabia Netting Opinions
ISDA has published new legal opinions that recognize the enforceability of close-out netting under regulations published by the Saudi Central Bank (SAMA) earlier this year. SAMA’s netting regulations were published in February, meaning all Group-of-20 jurisdictions now recognize the enforceability...
Get Ready for the ISDA Notices Hub
No one wants to have to terminate a derivatives trading relationship – that usually means a counterparty has failed to make a payment or has become insolvent. At an already stressful time, the last thing anyone needs is to experience...
ISDA Publishes Paper on SFDR Review
On June 23, ISDA and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) published a position paper on the review of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR). The paper acknowledges that the SFDR needs to be revised in line with...