CCPs will be required to establish robust recovery, continuity and resolution mechanisms. These must be addressed in relation to two situations: (1) at the “end of the default waterfall”; and (2) where there are non-default losses (NDL) that exceed a clearinghouse’s financial resources above the minimum regulatory capital requirements. This paper is in response to industry efforts to develop an effective recovery, continuity and resolution framework for central counterparties and reflects consensus views of the ISDA Risk and Margin Regulatory Implementation Committee (RIC).
Documents (1) for CCP Loss Allocation at the End of the Waterfall
Latest
Response on Legal Frameworks for Carbon Credits
On May 4, ISDA and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) responded to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on a legal framework for the inclusion of international carbon credits within the EU’s 2040 climate law framework. In the...
ISDA AGM Studio: Julia Hueckel and Chris Zuehlke
Julia Hueckel, director of global regulatory policy at Coinbase, and Chris Zuehlke, global head of Cumberland and partner at DRW, speak with Nicolette Cone, ISDA’s chief of staff and associate general counsel, on the rapidly evolving legislative framework for digital...
ISDA In Review – April 2026
A compendium of links to new documents, research papers, press releases and comment letters published by ISDA in April 2026.
Response to MAS on Recovery and Resolution
On May 8, ISDA and the FIA responded to the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s (MAS) consultation on recovery and resolution planning and enhancement of resolution powers for capital market infrastructures. The response supports the proposed framework for recovery and orderly...