The original ISDA OTC Derivatives Taxonomy (“Taxonomy v1.0”) has been in use for cross-jurisdictional reporting for Credit, Rates, Equities, Commodities and FX since 2012. In 2015, an update to the ISDA OTC Derivatives Taxonomies was undertaken through the collaboration of industry working groups, asset class experts, and steering committees to version 2.0 (“Taxonomy v2.0”). As global data harmonization efforts moved to the forefront, work on Taxonomy v2.0 was paused at the last point in the ISDA Taxonomy governance process, which is a period of public comment.
Therefore, Taxonomy v1.0 is still “live” and parties can opt to use Taxonomy v1.0 for purposes of regulatory transaction reporting. Taxonomy v1.0 values appear below.
Taxonomy v2.0 would be used to identify a product classification when requesting an ISIN from the ANNA DSB system for MiFID II.
For Taxonomy v1.0 or v2.0 questions, contact EHsu@isda.org.
Documents (1) for ISDA Taxonomy 1.0 – Regulatory Reporting
Latest
Response on Commodity Derivatives Markets
On April 22, ISDA and FIA submitted a joint response to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on the functioning of commodity derivatives markets and certain aspects relating to spot energy markets. In addition to questions on position management, reporting and...
Episode 50: The Value of Derivatives
A new report from ISDA shows that companies all over the world use derivatives to alleviate uncertainty, transfer risk and enhance profitability. ISDA discusses the findings with Boston Consulting Group’s Roy Choudhury. Please view this page via Chrome to access...
ISDA/IIF Response to EC Market Risk Consultation
On February 22, ISDA and the Institute of International Finance (IIF) submitted a joint response to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on the application of the market risk prudential framework. The associations believe the capital framework should be risk-appropriate and...
ISDA Submits Letter on Environmental Credits
On April 15, ISDA submitted a response to the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) consultation on environmental credits and environmental credit obligations. The response supports the FASB’s overall proposals to establish clear and consistent accounting guidance for environmental credits, but...